A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

one zero one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it can be convenient for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to eliminate a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's achieved to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has reached such stage. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners might seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed from the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

Previous four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, it is also a properly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is properly-settled that though thinking of the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the benefit of all the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of suitable candidates who are found to generally be most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored through the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.

There are innumerable instances where death was never intended – even more where All those nominated inside the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is a tragic event. Even so the death of any residing being is not any significantly less a tragic event.

P.C. Liability of petitioners for that reported offences would be determined with the realized trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value of your material produced before the same. Till then, case of

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case law at both the federal and state levels.

 Criminal cases While in the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil regulation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their personal previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same type of case.

147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay back fixation aren't entertainable for that reasons that these types of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, along with the legal grounds ubi jus ibi remedium case law for this petition are inadequate therefore this petition is dismissed, which requires disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court isn't inside of a position to dilate upon such disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more

competent authority has determined the eligibility in the private respondents and found them to generally be match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)